So I'm reading a disappointing book at
the moment. No worries, not by anyone I know... I just finished one
and went to my pile for a 'quick read' and pulled out a mystery, as I
am meant to be revising a mystery and so am trying to keep in mind
what works and doesn't. Sadly, I've found a COUPLE 'doesn'ts'
recently, so maybe I will include lessons from more than one book...
SHOW SHOW SHOW.
One of the most annoying things about
the one I am reading is it all feels like summary. Even the DIALOG
feels like summary. I'm not sure if it is the choice of narrator—the
author SORT OF changes perspective, but is not terribly DEEP in any
of them, so I'm not FEELING IT and so all of the PoVs end up feeling
just descriptive.
DIALOG, TAGS, and NAME CALLING
The thing that is REALLY driving me
crazy is the author keeps having the characters call each other by
name instead of using dialog tags. This is something I did a lot in
my first book and I felt very clever, but I have since read enough
WATCHING for it that it comes across as melodramatic. Watch
Supernatural some time—Dean and Sam use each other's names a lot
and it is just so much silliness (but they look good enough to make
me watch anyway—not so with no moving pictures). Once in a
conversation or LESS is much more realistic. Granted, there are
people who do this, but making it a tic for ONE character is a far
cry from making all of them do it. MOST people DON'T do this.
TENSION Must be SPECIFIC
This book keeps using vague threats and
expecting me to keep reading. I am irritated. Sadly, I am also a
person who usually finishes what I start. Tension should be tangible.
Maybe it is because they haven't attached me to the characters—maybe
if I cared more this vague tension would feel more tense—there HAVE
been attacks, but the characters aren't well drawn and the incidents
don't have any sort of build or tease. It is more 'this person does
something stupid and this bad thing happens'
Or if you can't, kill them. If you need
a character to do something really stupid, give them a compelling
reason (like cut off their other options, or increase the stakes so
they think they have no choice, or MUCH earlier give them a
compelling flaw that this situation fits so the reader thinks, well
sure, it's stupid, but it is her only real flaw). I get SO ANNOYED
with characters who seem set on their own destruction unless it is
part of a complete profile that is on a danger course. You CANNOT
convince me that an otherwise competent, mentally stable person is
that dumb. Seriously.
Oh, for Pete's Sake, DUMP the DAMSELS
in DISTRESS!!!
I like a hot guy as much as the next
girl, but I am SO not interested in reading about a woman who needs
to be saved all the time. Maybe ONCE. After she's saved a bunch of
people herself. But habitual victims are NOT interesting.
So there. Read any bad books lately
that have taught you what not to do?
10 comments:
Too stupid to live - sounds like most horror films.
I used name calling too much in the past. I know it. I confess! Making it better now.
I hate that continual usage of names. Oh my gosh! I almost never use anyone's name. Which works wonders when I've forgotten it.
"Which child are you again?"
I recently read the worst fantasy book that I ever finished (there have been worse, but those I never even got through). I guess I kept going because so many famous authors had quotes in the book raving about the author, so I kept thinking it had to get better. Really it's those quotes that make me mad, as I feel they are willfully deceptive. The writing was so bad that I can't imagine any serious person saying good things about the writer.
Every book I read either teaches me what to do or what not to do, sometimes even in the same book. Right now I'm reading The Hobbit, because I needed to just relax and enjoy perfection.
I'm sidetracking here but have you ever noticed that there are some names that people like to say. So everybody says their name when they talk to them. I mean in live-action real life, in a book it would probably be boring.
I heartily concur with all of this. I've been guilty of all of it and been called out by critique partners and editors. And I thank them very much.
You mean you don't like it when the girls go out in their nightgowns, carrying flashlights and walking barefoot to tip-toe down to The Black Lagoon even though the old hag and the wizened old peddler and the mysterious Knight in Black Armor tell them not to?
What's WRONG with you???
Love the Too Stupid to Live idea -- reminds me of the Darwin awards, which actually can make for pretty grim reading.
Damsels in distress in this day and age? They were common in old TV shows when I was growing up, and even as a little kid I couldn't believe how ditzy and useless they were.
It sounds like the writer of this bad book came up with a plot and then tried to squeeze the characters into it. And if the dialog doesn't work then the author doesn't know how to listen to people.
Sigh. I wish the writer well, but it sounds like he or she needs to start over.
If I start on a really bad book, I tend to get tired of it and not finish it.
I read a bad short story yesterday, but I had written it myself, do there is still a chance it can be improved. If I'm happy with the end result, I will share the story on the Internet, and drop it in my neighbours' mailboxes >:)
Cold As Heaven
I think what I come across is not so much as what you describe, but more of like springing the solution 30 pages into the book.
I recently read a book by a writer who won a few literary awards (pet peeve of mine) and because it was in genre that I like a little (mystery/crime) I checked out of the library. Roughly 30 pages in the solution to who the murderer was was revealed, and I'm assuming the other 150+ pages were simply exploring the what the characters were all about and having them examine themselves based on the murders in question.
I say assume because I never finished the book.
Father Nature's Corner
Post a Comment